Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this works
Profile Design Sonic Ergo 26a Aerobar vs Profile Design Subsonic Ergo 39a Aerobar
The specs that matter for triathlon, side by side, from each maker’s own published figures.
| Spec | Profile Design Sonic Ergo 26a Aerobar | Profile Design Subsonic Ergo 39a Aerobar |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 568 g | 590 g |
| Armrest pads | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustability | Wide range | Wide range |
| Price | See retailer | ~$276.25 |
Which should you pick?
Profile Design
Pick the Sonic Ergo 26a Aerobar if…
- you want the lighter one: 568 g vs 590 g
Profile Design
Pick the Subsonic Ergo 39a Aerobar if…
On the specs above it doesn’t pull ahead, so choose on fit, feel or price.
Check price →Specs from the makers’ own pages: Profile Design, Profile Design.
Not sure either is right?
Free tool
Tri Bike Decider
Road bike with clip-ons or a full tri bike? Answer honestly and find out.
Try the tool →
Free tool
Head-to-head comparisons
45 comparisons in this category, plus every other category.
All comparisons →