Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this works

Profile Design Sonic Ergo 52a Aerobar vs Profile Design Supersonic Ergo+ 35 SLC Aerobar

The specs that matter for triathlon, side by side, from each maker’s own published figures.

Specs for Profile Design Sonic Ergo 52a Aerobar and Profile Design Supersonic Ergo+ 35 SLC Aerobar
SpecProfile Design Sonic Ergo 52a AerobarProfile Design Supersonic Ergo+ 35 SLC Aerobar
Weight 586 g 627 g
Armrest pads Yes Yes
Adjustability Wide range Wide range

Which should you pick?

Profile Design

Pick the Sonic Ergo 52a Aerobar if…

  • you want the lighter one: 586 g vs 627 g
Check price →
Profile Design

Pick the Supersonic Ergo+ 35 SLC Aerobar if…

On the specs above it doesn’t pull ahead, so choose on fit, feel or price.

Check price →

Specs from the makers’ own pages: Profile Design, Profile Design.

Not sure either is right?

Free tool

Tri Bike Decider

Road bike with clip-ons or a full tri bike? Answer honestly and find out.

Try the tool →
Free tool

Head-to-head comparisons

45 comparisons in this category, plus every other category.

All comparisons →