Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this works
Saris M2 vs Wahoo KICKR CORE 2
The specs that matter for triathlon, side by side, from each maker’s own published figures.
| Spec | Saris M2 | Wahoo KICKR CORE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wheel-on | Direct drive |
| Max simulated grade | 15% | 16% |
| Max power | 1,500 W | 1,800 W |
| Power accuracy | ±5% | ±2% |
| ERG mode | Yes | Yes |
| Folds for storage | Yes | — |
| Cassette included | No | Yes |
| Built-in WiFi | No | Yes |
Which should you pick?
Saris
Pick the M2 if…
On the specs above it doesn’t pull ahead, so choose on fit, feel or price.
Check price →
Wahoo
Pick the KICKR CORE 2 if…
- you want steeper simulated climbs: 16% vs 15%
- you want more resistance for sprints: 1,800 W vs 1,500 W
- you want tighter power accuracy: ±2% vs ±5%
- you want a cassette in the box
- you want built-in WiFi
Specs from the makers’ own pages: Saris, Wahoo.
Not sure either is right?
Free tool
Smart Trainer Picker
ERG workouts, road feel or a small flat? Trainers scored on the makers’ own specs.
Try the tool →
Free tool
Head-to-head comparisons
78 comparisons in this category, plus every other category.
All comparisons →