Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this works
Tacx NEO 3M vs Wahoo KICKR CORE 2
The specs that matter for triathlon, side by side, from each maker’s own published figures.
| Spec | Tacx NEO 3M | Wahoo KICKR CORE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Direct drive | Direct drive |
| Max simulated grade | 25% | 16% |
| Max power | 2,200 W | 1,800 W |
| Power accuracy | ±1% | ±2% |
| ERG mode | Yes | Yes |
| Folds for storage | Yes | — |
| Cassette included | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in WiFi | No | Yes |
Which should you pick?
Tacx
Pick the NEO 3M if…
- you want steeper simulated climbs: 25% vs 16%
- you want more resistance for sprints: 2,200 W vs 1,800 W
- you want tighter power accuracy: ±1% vs ±2%
Specs from the makers’ own pages: Tacx, Wahoo.
Not sure either is right?
Free tool
Smart Trainer Picker
ERG workouts, road feel or a small flat? Trainers scored on the makers’ own specs.
Try the tool →
Free tool
Head-to-head comparisons
78 comparisons in this category, plus every other category.
All comparisons →