Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this works
Tacx NEO 3M vs Zwift Ride (with KICKR CORE 2)
The specs that matter for triathlon, side by side, from each maker’s own published figures.
| Spec | Tacx NEO 3M | Zwift Ride (with KICKR CORE 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Direct drive | Smart bike |
| Max simulated grade | 25% | 16% |
| Max power | 2,200 W | 1,800 W |
| Power accuracy | ±1% | ±2% |
| ERG mode | Yes | Yes |
| Folds for storage | Yes | — |
| Cassette included | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in WiFi | No | Yes |
| Price | See retailer | ~$1,299.99 |
Which should you pick?
Tacx
Pick the NEO 3M if…
- you want steeper simulated climbs: 25% vs 16%
- you want more resistance for sprints: 2,200 W vs 1,800 W
- you want tighter power accuracy: ±1% vs ±2%
Specs from the makers’ own pages: Tacx, Zwift.
Not sure either is right?
Free tool
Smart Trainer Picker
ERG workouts, road feel or a small flat? Trainers scored on the makers’ own specs.
Try the tool →
Free tool
Smart trainers, compared
Every product in this category in one spec table, plus 91 head-to-heads.
See them all →